UK Israel multiple jabs show some disturbing data – and that’s literally the bottom line

An Inconvient truth.

Global Research report a Bombshell namely the ‘UK Data Destroys Entire Premise for Vaccine Push’ Global Research reports “the UK government just reported the following data, tucked away in their report on variants of concern: Less than a third of delta variant deaths are in the unvaccinated.

Let me say that another way – two-thirds of Delta deaths in the UK are in the jabbed. To be specific: From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths (yes, the dreaded Delta has not taken that much life). Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.

The report

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and
variants under investigation in
England dated August 6th 2021 is located here.

“But this is the crucial page. Look at the bottom line.”

402 deaths out of 47 008 cases in vaccinated; 253 deaths out of 151 054 cases in unvaccinated. If you get covid having been vaccinated, according to this data, you are much more likely to die than if you were not vaccinated!”

One Report Does Not Make A Study.

This is of concern but one report does not make a study. Though no doubt the anti-vaxer crowd will hold this up high as ‘proof’ they are right. While with equally certain the pro vaxer zealots will respond by down playing the reports findings off hand, like they dismissed the Wuhan Virology role in Covid and have flipped flopped on masks (at the start saying those who insisted we use them were paranoid and then saying any critique of mask was foolish — as they now admit the reality is surgical mask do work best and cloth ones don’t (duh)), assuming they even mention it to begin with.

Big Pharma spends 19 X the amount of money it spends on research on Sales & Marketing. Top Pharma Companies based on revenue and R&D. Source PHARMEXEC.COM

Still it is becoming clear, even in MSM corporate media land, that the line that was initially spun keeps moving.

A line delivered so earnestly by politicians, corporate lobbyist, social media platforms owned by tech firms heavily invested in pharmaceutical companies, the army of foundations think tanks, all funded by the same parties (who spend 19 times the amount they spend on research on marketing and lobbying, buy politicians and hyping their products – whether they can deliver actual results or not As America opioid crisis and billion dollar law suits proves). The line being that if you take the jab once you’ll be protected from Covid for years. Another lie emerging as shock horror a global variant mutates faster than drug companies can rush out even more new and untested vaccines (and that was always going to be a winner). Under this scenario all vaccines are good. Which is equally moronic as saying all vaccines are bad.

Medical News Today reports (undated but make reference to an event on August2021) ‘Delta infection: unvaccinated and vaccinated people have similar levels of virus’. And to be frank the article is a bit of a worry as it is in fact referring to a “new study.”

Yet when you click on the link it leads you to a portion of report titled ‘Impact of Delta on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK. The report is undated but provides an IP address listed as16-08-2021. So it’s not new information but old and data now over taken by unfolding events but reported as breaking news.

Medical News confirms the report “drew on data” from the UK Covid Infection survey. It however omits in the article what the time frame of this survey was. Reading the report itself it we discover covers the time frame covers 1 December 2020 (start of vaccination rollout) to 16 May 2021, when Alpha dominated, and from 17 May 2021 to 1 August 2021 when Delta emerged. The first and more current report covers the time frame 1st of February 2021 to the 2nd of August 2021. The second Imperial College (for want of abetter description) data focuses on infection verse the first report which looks at deaths.

With out doing a deeper dive each report suggest radically different interpretation of the fact based upon the selected focus of their studies.

US Medical News chooses to focus on infection rates not actual fatalities. It instead reports “Despite tremendous efforts by Member States to vaccinate people across the region, millions more remain unvaccinated and therefore at risk of ending up in [the] hospital…The good news is that the data clearly shows that receiving a full vaccination series significantly reduces the risk of severe disease and death. When called to do so, people should get vaccinated,” says Dr. Kluge. It continues “While the vaccines still offer protection against the Delta variant, they are less effective than against previous variants, such as Alpha. Delta is more infectious than previous variants, and researchers, drawing on the latest population data, have found that this is the case for people who have and have not had the vaccination” .

Clicking on the report’s listed link in fact simply takes you through to the Imperial College of Medicine who in place of an actual report offers up cartoons.

Imperial College first gained fame an instant credibility issues as the home of the report written by Dr Neil Ferguson which sparked the global lock down. Within days of being released Ferguson data proved highly flawed and led to him rushing through amendments which Ferguson would not be drawn on, explaining to reporters at the time that he had contracted covid and had to go into isolation immediately. Just one problem their Ferguson temporarily lost his golden boy status (until things died down and he was slipped quietly back into the rank of approved experts were expected to trust) when it emerged Ferguson was not isolating as he claimed. Rather as the ‘experts’ boomed we must lock down or all die Ferguson was in fact downing his trousers and having an affair with his neighbour wife and permitting his bubble to be breached. A classic example of ‘do as we say not as we do’ from the ‘experts’ were told repeatedly we must listen to as they know best.

The cry for more vaccines booster jab is also being based around Israel vaccination role out.

Israel has one of the world’s highest levels of vaccination for COVID-19. 78% of those 12 and older are fully vaccinated, the majority of those with the Pfizer vaccine. Yet Israel is now logging one of the world’s highest infection rates. 650 new cases daily per million people. Over half are in fully vaccinated people, underscoring the high level of transmissibility of the Delta variant and raising concerns on the science page of AAAA.COM (A grim warning from Israel: Vaccination blunts, but does not defeat Delta) “that the benefits of vaccination ebb over time” so people will need more booster jabs.

Now we have 9/11 style mission creep. Having being told by the same parties cited above that one jab would give protections for years the new line in the sand has become; ‘oh no you will need to buy and receive more booster shots’. Just like Bill Gates Window’s you will receive never ending updates. Good for Pfizer bank balance but not quite what were told at the start of Covid.

It remains to be seen if like the UK the number of deaths in Israel will increase exponentially in the population of those with multiple jabs. Whether we see an upwards trend where the more jabs you get the greater the risk is of negative side affects.

The Accidental Activist.

This was always the position of Professor Chris Shaw of British Columbia (who studied mass vaccination spurred on by Gulf war syndrome) when I discussed the issue with him in Otago back in the days of swine flu. A pre Covid era where Robert Webster of St Jude (an Otago graduate) warned unless vaccines are applied and made correctly the cure can become itself a vector for even more power and virulent strains.

Shaw is controversial figure in academia. Shaw, who is also Lieutenant Colonel in the Canadian Reserves, claims he only became an accidental activist after he had completed the study. Regardless Webster is highly respected recognised world expert and yet his warnings of the risk of bad vaccines have gone virtually unreported. Both raise pertinent questions not being asked in the current climate of fear where Anti vaxers and pro vaxers both screech their message in hysterical and increasingly aggressive dogmatic tones.

To know the truth perhaps it now time to review the patient zero history of emerging strains to assess whether those subjects were vaccinated or unvaccinated. Yet Shaw is not alone. The risk of multiple jabs is also the view of the Gulf War syndrome movement and their advocates that multiple jabs may enhance the risk of side affects exponentially and reduce immunity. So the idea that the more you get (and the shorter the window in between) the greater the risk is hardly fringe science concern. The proof of the pudding will of course be simple to sit back and observe whether the UK SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern case findings are replicated else where. With Covid deaths rising in vaccinated population in correlation with the number of jabs they get. This however is probably not the most ethical approach to this issue.

To repeat and stress Shaw’s findings are an observed hypothesis not an accepted peer review accepted fact and are based on his own studies of mice where he replicated the inoculation process. Replicating the numbers of jabs given to US combat soldiers in Iraq and in the Marshal Island. The Marshal Islands, in the Pacific, is where Shaw began his study and found similar issues to Iraq veterans in mass vaccination programs using men of the same age as the veterans (Shaw’s research focused on the harm he believed was caused by vaccine adjuvants as opposed to the vaccines themselves). One major point not contested is Shaw’s claims that no study on the impact of multiple jabs in mass vaccination programs has ever being released can be confirmed ;”To date, no controlled trials and very few observational studies have determined the impact of vaccination schedules on overall health. The balance of the risks and benefits from mass vaccination therefore remains uncertain”*1.

Source: Multiple Vaccinations and the Enigma of Vaccine Injury Anthony R Mawson 1, National Library of Medicine.

Study finds Antibodies from prior Covid infections provide more protection than being vaccinated.

Meanwhile the British Medical Journal reports having antibodies from prior Covid infections provide more protection than being vaccinated*2.

The Study found that people who tested positive for Covid19 were less likely to become infected, ill, or need hospital treatment than those who had two dose of the Pfeizer vaccine but no previous infection. The study was conducted in Israel. It is the largest study to have compared natural immunity from Covid Infection with vaccination. The report was published on the website medRxiv, run by the British Medical Journal and Yale University in advance of peer review studies and again come with a caution this is a research paper not accepted fact.

*2 Source: Waning immunity of the BNT162b2 vaccine: A nationwide study from Israel Yair Goldberg, Micha Mandel, Yinon M. Bar-On, Omri Bodenheimer, Laurence S Freedman, Eric Haas, Ron Milo, Sharon Alroy-Preis, Nachman Ash, Amit Huppertdoi

That its now emerging that those who had Covid 19 original strain have a better chance of surviving Covid Delta than those vaccinated brings us full circle. Namely back to the original Swedish position of herd immunity and Dr Anders Tegnell, the state epidemiologist, who said Sweden should “stick with the science” and play the long game and not be bullied into taking a “gamble” by corporate lobbyists. Sweden eventually capitulated, after high level of deaths in their elderly population, a consequence of two factors;

A) Sweden has a high elderly population (who live up to a decade longer on average than their other EU counterparts) and so higher numbers in the elderly was always going to be likely.

B) Unlike Taiwan Sweden policy made an error in that it failed to put in adequate protection for vulnerable populations.

That said will Sweden get the last laugh?

If the UK Israel findings are not blips (even withstanding Sweden does now have a vaccination program rolling out) and their population of people originally infected, proportionally to the rest of central Europe, in terms of exposure to the original Covid variant, it seems logical that they too will end up with a population not as badly affected by the Delta variant. Verse populations who chose mass vaccination on the understanding they would only require one jab and it would all be over by Christmas.

Has It All Being A Big Bloody Game of Charades?

Siouxsie Wiles  Scientist turned PR celebrity engages in a game of Charades with her new celebrity friends.

In which case the proof begins to mount that we have being bullied by lobbyists and pseudo scientist posing with pink hair and spectacle as rock stars in an elaborate game of charades.

Or will the number shows this is an aberration a blip and yes the vaccinated end up on top.

One more argument for mandatory vaccination and world where every year we get more and more jabs to protect us from a never ending wave of new virulent viruses. As the initial promise of just one jab like any other vaccine fades in our collective memory as America’s Never Ending Wars are replaced by ‘Never Ending Jabs’.

Or do we put a hand break on the idea we simply rush out vaccines with substandard testing and legal indemnity clauses (which once you do the math reveals this would enrich big pharma even more than if it actually succeeded). That instead we start reviewing that data in a way were the popularity of anti vaccine and pro vaccine camps, not actually considered, as we let science speak free of corporate mouth pieces and the McCarthyism of the big pharma imbedded media machine. A monstrous machine which increasingly resembles the embedded nature of a corporate media who told us their were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the USA must go into Afghanistan. Policies incidentally let us not forget pushed by the same global leaders now telling us we must listen to their ‘experts’ as they know best.

Listening to actual experts is an idea well past it due date. In the context that actual experts seem short on numbers when compared to the army of corporate zampolits and industry lobbyists, who from the start of the outbreak have insisted on having a monopoly over the truth. Who have not owned the reality that their truth (sales pitch) has constantly being shifting as the reality of Covid refuses to perform according to their Corporate ‘FACTs’. Facts which seem more concerned on creating profit than delivering a safe and effective global response to Covid.


One comment

  1. You’ve really outdone yourself one this one Ben. puts together all the pieces I’ve been getting over the past week or two and makes a clear picture.
    (Glad to se you sticking it to Siouxsie; I’ve had a few digs at her myself, total media puppet).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.